">
Runboard.com
Слава Україні!
Please
Read Rules Click for Rules


ALL Open Forum Baseball Mules/HF's ATT Park FAQ&Admin

v

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4 

 
Xellos007 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

HALL OF FAME POSTER

Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 1418
Reply | Quote
Sabean talks about the draft


That is my opinion.

Right now Lowry until he can prove 2005 is not a fluke is more valuable to the giants then as trade bait.

---

2/25/2008, 7:31 pm Link to this post   
 
asu9856 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Banned user

Registered: 10-2006
Location: Sacramento, CA soon
Posts: 2650
Reply | Quote
Sabean talks about the draft


Sabean was at the game?!?!? !@#$ i was at that game. Can't believe I didn't see him

---
"Am I a special motherfucking human, or what?" Barry Bonds
2/25/2008, 7:53 pm Link to this post   
 
philramirez Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

ALL-STAR POSTER

Registered: 07-2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 498
Reply | Quote
Re: Sabean talks about the draft


quote:

asu9856 wrote:

Sabean was at the game?!?!? !@#$ i was at that game. Can't believe I didn't see him



Do you know why Raoul Torrez isn't starting at short. I know he can't hit but most publications still had him penciled in as the starter... Anyways I played against that guy since I was 10.

---

2/25/2008, 9:00 pm Link to this post   
 
chefjuan Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

HALL OF FAME POSTER

Registered: 04-2006
Posts: 3718
Reply | Quote
Re: Sabean talks about the draft


I am not impressed. Sabean claims that drafting pitching is such a great plan yet every two years or so he goes out and spends stupid amounts of money of bullpen help.

Every time he gets called out for bad drafting, they finger always goes to Cain, Timmy and Lowry. But if you keep taking pitchers, shouldn't you also eventually come up with a bullpen, too? I mean, those guys are pitchers, right? It looks like Wilson may work out, but how long has it been? How many 'mandos, worrells, klines, stantons, fasseros, browers and hermansons are they going to go through? The fact remains, in 10 years there are 6 pitchers that have really become pretty good pitchers (Cain, Tim, Lowry, Corriea, Henny and Linebrink) That's still not a very good track record.

So is the idea that you throw as many pitchers against the wall and hope a couple stick? It such a deeply flawed philosophy. And the idea that the young pitchers are some sort of currency is even MORE flawed since there are so few that work out.

Six players out of 550 picks in ten years have been become solid major leaguers. I guess seven if you count Boof Bonser. Helluva track record.

---
"If the Pilgrims had landed in California the East Coast would still be wilderness"
2/25/2008, 9:13 pm Link to this post   
 
MarcoPolo666 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

LIVING LEGEND

Registered: 07-2007
Posts: 7515
Reply | Quote
Re: Sabean talks about the draft


quote:

chefjuan wrote:
Every time he gets called out for bad drafting, they finger always goes to Cain, Timmy and Lowry.



Only the last 2-3 years. Before that, he was zero-for-sixteen.gazillion


quote:

chefjuan wrote:
How many 'mandos, worrells, klines, stantons, fasseros, browers and hermansons are they going to go through? The fact remains, in 10 years there are 6 pitchers that have really become pretty good pitchers (Cain, Tim, Lowry, Corriea, Henny and Linebrink) That's still not a very good track record.



First, who cares about cheap bullpen help? A crappy #3/4 starter costs $8M-$10M. Random bullpen help costs $2M. Unless, of course, you are talking about signing FA closers to closer contracts (Armando, Nen, etc). Signing closers is *most often* a really stupid thing to do. Instead, you sign random "setup men" and let them close for cheap (or grow them yourself. Paying them $7-$9M is for morons.

Second, you only list pitchers that were successful with the Giants. Did you forget about a certain Joe Nathan? Maybe one or two others?

quote:

chefjuan wrote:
Six players out of 550 picks in ten years have been become solid major leaguers. I guess seven if you count Boof Bonser. Helluva track record.



You miscounted. And Sabes covered his ass by trading guys away for "veteran" help. We never had to suffer through the poor performances of many of our draftees. (Yes, that's tongue in cheek.)


---
Do not suggest trading for somebody for only two years (unless the Giants dump a crappy contract)
2/25/2008, 9:32 pm Link to this post   
 
FATALFART Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

HALL OF FAME POSTER

Registered: 11-2006
Posts: 1681
Reply | Quote
Sabean talks about the draft


drafting pitching pitching doesnt seem to work these days. teams are refusing to trade their top hitters and are signing them to long term deals as soon as they make the bigs. the young positional player has become the golden goose.
2/25/2008, 10:00 pm Link to this post   
 
asu9856 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Banned user

Registered: 10-2006
Location: Sacramento, CA soon
Posts: 2650
Reply | Quote
Re: Sabean talks about the draft


quote:

philramirez wrote:

quote:

asu9856 wrote:

Sabean was at the game?!?!? !@#$ i was at that game. Can't believe I didn't see him



Do you know why Raoul Torrez isn't starting at short. I know he can't hit but most publications still had him penciled in as the starter... Anyways I played against that guy since I was 10.





Yeah exactly. I think we talked about his when I met you that one time a long time ago. He can't hit and Champagnie can. He probably will take over the 2B job soon though because Elmore can't hit or field.


---
"Am I a special motherfucking human, or what?" Barry Bonds
2/25/2008, 10:41 pm Link to this post   
 
MarcoPolo666 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

LIVING LEGEND

Registered: 07-2007
Posts: 7515
Reply | Quote
Re: Sabean talks about the draft


quote:

FATALFART wrote:
 teams are refusing to trade their top hitters and are signing them to long term deals as soon as they make the bigs. the young positional player has become the golden goose.



Hmm. And what happens when one trades a top pitcher? Or even a mediocre pitcher that has just had a good year? Cha CHING! Prospects out the yin-yang.

You're keeping your blinders on. Good, established players are not cheap - pitchers OR position players. That's why Sabes should be trading for propsects - to hope fully grow a few of our own, for cheap.

---
Do not suggest trading for somebody for only two years (unless the Giants dump a crappy contract)
2/25/2008, 11:07 pm Link to this post   
 
Bhaakon Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

HALL OF FAME POSTER

Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 3591
Reply | Quote
Sabean talks about the draft


There's no denying that good young pitching is worth alot on the trade market, it's just fallacious to claim that it's worth more than good young hitting.

The problem is that, while ther Giants have been well above average at developing pitchers, their overall development (pitching and hitting combined) is still below average, and too much of what the Giants have developed has been lost in flatly bad trades. The whole point of focusing on developing pitching is to use the surplus to acquire young hitters, but the Giants' surplus has been both insufficient for the task and poorly spent.
2/26/2008, 12:00 am Link to this post   
 
TheMalcontent Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

HALL OF FAME POSTER

Registered: 10-2006
Posts: 3130
Reply | Quote
Re: Sabean talks about the draft


quote:

Bhaakon wrote:

There's no denying that good young pitching is worth alot on the trade market, it's just fallacious to claim that it's worth more than good young hitting.

The problem is that, while ther Giants have been well above average at developing pitchers, their overall development (pitching and hitting combined) is still below average, and too much of what the Giants have developed has been lost in flatly bad trades. The whole point of focusing on developing pitching is to use the surplus to acquire young hitters, but the Giants' surplus has been both insufficient for the task and poorly spent.



Yeah, our pitching surplus has been spent on aging vets with plenty of grit on them.

I agree with you here, talent, any talent whether pitching or hitting will net good return.

---

2/26/2008, 12:32 am Link to this post   
 


QUICK REPLY

Page:  1  2  3  4 





You are not logged in (login)

>BACK TO THE TOP<

LINKS
Retrosheet - Baseball Reference - The Baseball Cube
OFFICIAL SF Giants Board - Active Roster - 40 Man Roster
SF 2010 Schedule - SF Gate on ATT Park - KNBR Podcasts
MLB Rumors - Baseball Think Factory - Hardball Times
Fantasy Baseball Hub - Fan Graphs - Cot's Contracts
Minor Giants Daily Recap - Seat Data - SFDugout.com
AZ Giants Spring/ Fall Blog - Your Giants Korea - El Lefty Malo
Chris Haft - Huff Daddy - Inside Giants Clubhouse
McCovey Chronicles - Dodger Blues - Extra Baggs
LINKS OF FAME